DISQUS

Nashua Telegraph: President is not acting presidential - NashuaTelegraph.com

  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    Critical comments... "he's a racist - he hates white people"
    Don't you normally expect critical comments to have some basis in fact?

    At his six month anniversary I took the time to make a list of his accomplishments... here's that...

    # Signed executive orders to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, within a year, ban torture and end the CIA’s secret overseas prisons and define treatment of Detainees.
    # Reversed restrictions on stem cell research.
    # Signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Reducing discrimination based on gender, age, religion, or race.
    # Signed an executive order reversing the ban that prohibits funding to international family planning groups that provide abortions. Gag rule revoked (Mexico City policy).
    # Creates the White House Council on Women and Girls "to provide a coordinated federal response to the challenges confronted by women and girls and to ensure that all Cabinet and Cabinet-level agencies consider how their policies and programs impact women and families."
    # Signed a Presidental Memorandum extending federal benefits to same-sex partners of federal workers and announced support for the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act of 2009.
    # Reverses U.S. position on LGBT Issues at the UN: At the "Durban Review Conference," U.S. supports language condemning “all forms of discrimination and all other human rights violations based on sexual orientation.”
    # Signed executive order requiring federal contractors to offer jobs to current workers when contracts change.
    # Reversed a Bush order requiring federal contractors to post notice that workers can limit financial support of unions serving as their exclusive bargaining representatives.
    # Signed executive order preventing federal contractors from being reimbursed for expenses meant to influence workers deciding whether to form a union and engage in collective bargaining.
    # Created a foreclosure prevention fund for homeowners.
    # Expanded eligibility for the refinancing portion of the Making Home Affordable plan to help Americans struggling with distressed mortgages refinance at lower interest rates, even if they owe up to 25 percent more than their homes are now worth.
    # Established a credit card "bill of rights".
    # Expanded loan programs for small businesses.
    # Extended and index the 2007 Alternative Minimum Tax patch.
    # Expanded eligibility for State Children's Health Insurance Fund (SCHIP).
    # Expanded funding to train primary care providers and public health practitioners.
    # Created a new White House task force on the problems of middle-class Americans, and installed Vice President Joe Biden as its chairman.
    # Appoints Vice President Joe Biden to Oversee Stimulus Plan Payouts.
    # Granted a reprieve to Liberian immigrants facing imminent expulsion.
    # Directed military leaders to end war in Iraq.
    # Allowing Caskets to be photographed when the return from Iraq with family approval.
    # Released nine previously secret internal Justice Department memos and opinions defining the legal limits of government power in combating terrorism.
    # On Arab TV Network, Obama Urges Dialogue.
    # Gave a speech in Cairo engaging the Muslim and Arab world.
    # Bars independent contractors from conducting interrogations of terror suspects.
    # Granted Americans unrestricted rights to visit family and send money to Cuba.
    # Ordered the release of nearly a quarter of a million pages of records from the Reagan White House that were kept from the public during a lengthy review by President George W. Bush.
    # Restored funding for the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne/JAG) program.
    # Released presidential records.
    # Required new hires to sign a form affirming their hiring was not due to political affiliation or contributions.
    # Pushed for enactment of Matthew Shepard Act, which expands hate crime law to include sexual orientation and other factors.
    # Invites gay families to the Easter Egg Roll as part of the Obama administration's outreach to diverse communities.
    # Created a White House Office on Urban Policy.
    # Increased funding for the NEA.
    # Appointed an assistant to the president for science and technology policy.
    # Funded a major expansion of AmeriCorps.
    # Banned lobbyist gifts to executive employees.
    # Investment in all types of alternative energy.
    # Enacted tax credit for consumers for plug-in hybrid cars.
    # Support for high-speed rail.
    # Provided grants to encourage energy-efficient building codes.
    # Extended unemployment insurance benefits and temporarily suspend taxes on these benefits.
    # Created the White House Council on Automotive Communities and Workers to help auto industry workers transition to new manufacturing opportunities, including jobs in alternative energy.
    # Stopped raids on medical marijuana dispensers.
    # Nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court of the United States. If confirmed, Sotomayor would be the first Hispanic to ever serve on the Supreme Court.
    # Appointed more than 60 openly LGBT persons to positions in the executive branch.
    # Issues Presidential Proclamation for Pride, proclaiming June 2009 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month.
    # Signed a mercury reduction pact with 140 other nations.
    # Signed the Weapons System Acquisition Reform Act to curb wasteful spending by the Pentagon. Intended to price contracts and budgets lower; may potentially save billions of dollars in defense.
    # Signed the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act of 2009, which serves to protect two million acres of land and creates a new system of land conservation for the Bureau of Land Management.
    # Phase out government payments to crop producers making more than $500,000 a year and eliminates subsidies for cotton storage to help trim the U.S. budget deficit.
    # Cut funding for a proposed U.S. nuclear storage facility at Yucca Mountain.
    # Restored Endangered Species Act Provision requiring U.S. agencies consult with independent federal experts to determine if their actions might harm threatened and endangered species.
    # Orders The Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration "to protect and restore the health, heritage, natural resources, and social and economic value of the Nation's largest estuarine ecosystem and the natural sustainability of its watershed."
    # Signed the 2009 Omnibus Public Land Management Act designating two million additional acres of public wilderness areas the highest level of government protection from logging and other forms of commercial use and development.
    # Signed the Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act which will expedite the search for cures and treatments for millions of Americans living with paralysis caused by spinal cord injury, stroke, MS, Parkinson's and many other diseases and disorders.
    # Established The Joint Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record, a new system for updating medical records of servicemen and women both during and after their military careers.
    # Established the White House Office of Health Reform
    # Created new and stronger safety standards to safeguard the country's food supply.

    I know this won't matter to you, he's not the person you want in the White House...
  • baseballnh · 1 month ago
    Nice work Tesha, the facts don't lie. Its pretty tough to get your entire agenda as a Presient done in 9 months. Last I checked a term was 4 years. Do conservatives believe it was changed to a one year term recently?
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    Yes, the facts do not lie. Unemployment is at 10% and the military leaders in Afghanistan are waiting for help. Obama may have done a great job on the country's food supply, mercury reduction, credit card laws, etc. but he is not getting th job done on the important issues. His first judgement comes in November 2010.
  • baseballnh · 1 month ago
    Seamus, this isn't the drive through line at McDonald's here. Recovery takes time, and 9 months isn't a whole hell of a lot of time. Greatest downturn since the 1920-30's, the fact that most of the populous is still working, is a blessing. Please don't pull a Dick Cheney and try and pin Afghanistan on Barack, what did the Bush administration do with that war for the last 8 years....ah yes nothing. Putting American lives in danger is no small task, the President is not rushing to judgement and is making a well thought out decision. And yes he will be judged in 2010, and the extremely large super right wing majority will be soundly rejected again. The GOP needs a more centrist candidate and until that time it will continue to be the party of no one.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    It’s been three months since General Stanley McChrystal informed the Obama administration of the resources he needs to successfully prosecute the war. Time for Obama to move ahead with a surge in Afghanistan similar to what was done in Iraq. The military leaders are still waiting for an answer....
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    If this doesn't work - will you be willing to sign up and join them?
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Obama has committed to sending 35,000 troops.
    Bush took eight months to decide to send troops to Afghanistan.
    Nobody is sitting around waiting for an answer in Afghanistan.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Amen, bbnh.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    America does not torture people anymore.

    That is an important issue, a policy that Obama changed.

    Yes, Obama IS getting the job done on theimportant issues. He's been ini office barely 10 months. Change is a happening thing.



  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Yes, Facts don't lie. Obama has committed to sending 35,000 more troops to Afghanistan, economic indicators have turned around, and even deficit projection have come down since July.

    Obama is getting the Job done on the important issues to Americans.

    Is it possible for Republicans to lose more seats in 2010?
    With the GOP campaign line of "We chose to do nothing in the face of adversity" I am sure they will.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    MJ ...... Too much liberal Kool aide... look at the unemployment over 10% and still climbing. Are economic indicators turning around? Are you listening too much to MSNBC or the Obama party line?
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    "US leading economic indicators rose 1% in September, the sixth straight
    increase and a strong signal that a "recovery is developing," the
    Conference Board reported Thursday."
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/leading-indica...
  • SongbirdinNH · 1 month ago
    That interminable expression "kool aide" [sic] is my clue that the commenter is a mindless flinger of jargon.

    L-R, where were you when the whole nation was told up front to our face that this economic crisis was a long time in coming, was inherited from the previous administration, and that recovering from it would necessarily be a long and slow process for which the current administration could no way be blamed? WHERE WERE YOU?? It was a scant year ago!
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Song: Wish people would stop with the KoolAid remarks since I believe it refers to the horrible Jones event where so many died.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    I have to admit, I use it - and with that reference.
    Graphic response follows...

    I use it because I see people making decisions based on what their leader tells them - no matter how much it will harm themselves and their loved ones.

    Like the people saying they don't want public insurance made available - when they are the very ones who may wind up needing it. Yet they mouth what the insurance company pushes through ads and Fox and paid "grassroots" website and busses traveling the country. There can't be any other clearer picture in my mind than the piles of dead that kind of blind following produced.
  • SongbirdinNH · 1 month ago
    That's my recollection, too. The expression in any case isn't clever, and
    has become the topping on arguments that are just echoes of echoes.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Tesha: I agree with your analogy. Just wish we could find another phrase that was just as on the money but didn't invoke memories of horror.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Let me reask the quesion....What did Obama REALLY do versus what he has told us he would do? He had a dream but no plan. He expects Congress to do his bidding and figure things out. Meanwhile he travels the country with his Teleprompter. Mind you, I am not mad that he is ineffective because his agenda is socialist and thankfully has not had that much success to date. He has little time left before the new elections in 2010 when he may lose the Congress. Congress is already balking.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    I think you can read, am I correct?

    The list above is a short list of the things he's done in the first 6 months - the list is longer now...

    He's not a socialist, he's not even very left-leaning, and you're points? sound rather like a list of things you heard somewhere. Sad.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Not a Socialist....ha. What do you call spreading the Wealth. Look at his campaign promises it is full of Socialistic programs and policies. He has moved some right because he is bucking too many moderates and conservatives and unless he gets their buyins he can not get any of his agenda passed. In this process he is pissing off his left wingers. No he is a Utopian Socialist to me.....nice concepts but long ago shown as not real world. Conservatives fear is that in the process of moving to Socialiism that the US economy will go down along with our standard of living.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    Let me see if I understand your theory.

    He's a socialist... but he's not catering to the far left?
    He's a socialist... but he hasn't taken over all business and given
    them to the workers?

    Is that what you call logic? You need to look up socialism and try
    again, buddy - you're way off - or you're drinking the Fox Brand
    Propaganda Juice.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    No, he is a Socialist but being a pragmatist has had to back off his efforts in order to get legistlation passed....he is not getting exactly what he wants but is getting movement to the left which is what he does want.

    Yup, he has taken over the banking system and car companies. He would love to Nationalize healthcare. He just needs more time and more control of Congress to get his socialist policies in place.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    sorta undercover socialist... right? and he's taken over the banks, huh?

    do you actually LIVE in the USA?
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    So Tesha...... what do you call Obama.... a conservative....perhaps he is by your way of thinking.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    he's a moderate -
    He's a bit too far right for me, and I think trying to work with a
    group that is doing it's level best to trash everything that needs
    doing is pointless.


    But you should really check the -isms you throw around so easily,
    using them to describe Obama makes you look rather foolish.
  • woodysix8 · 1 month ago
    Ok, I can accept that he's not a "socialist" but "not left leaning" cmon get real
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Tesha.... So as mentioned earlier it appears that Obama is a Moderate to you only because you are so far left. Moderate he is not.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    L_R,
    Can you even see moderate from where your standing?
  • SongbirdinNH · 1 month ago
    L-R, has anyone informed you that it is Congress's job, not the president's, to legislate? You expect this president to do everything, claim he's done nothing, and yet whack him down for even attempting to exercise presidential leadership. He's been in office for 9 months, and you're saying his time is up. L-R, you've tied your tongue in a hopeless knot.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    That is a cop out. He told us all that HE would do in his campaign. Closing Gitmo was one of his first directives.....he probably thought that was a "no brainer". But it was a "no brainer" only because he did not think it through and know it was more complicated than just giving a directive. We are still waiting on this. Sure the Legistlative branch writes the bills but they are not their to do the Presidents bidding. Those were his campaign promises so he should have at least a clue on how he intends to get them completed. What he drew up was a "wish list".
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    When you listen to candidates for office, you forget the limits of the Constitution, and assume the candidate will become a dictator?

    What do you then think of a candidate for Congress who promises to do anything? When the rest of Congress does not support what (s)he promised, is that failure?

    You are now accusing the P of NOT being a dictator. I can see why you chose a flip-flip handle.
  • SongbirdinNH · 1 month ago
    L-R, the same grotesque contradiction. You want him to do everything
    single-handedly, but would slam him if he even tried.
  • SongbirdinNH · 1 month ago
    L-R, your ridiculousness is called "damned if you do, damned if you don't." If you don't see that that's what you're doing, there is no basis for any further discussion with you here.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promise...

    The Obameter: Tracking Obama's Campaign Promises
    "PolitiFact has compiled about 500 promises that Barack Obama made during the campaign and is tracking their progress on our Obameter. We rate their status as No Action, In the Works or Stalled. Once we find action is completed, we rate them Promise Kept, Compromise or Promise Broken."
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    I looked up your Obamameter and he has completed 50 our of 518 campaign promises. Not too bad but some were just gimme's such as buying his daughters a dog. The tough ones are coming.
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    and 7 broken and 14 compromised.... and many more being worked on.

    He's doing a good job - and he's squarely facing all the problems thrown at him with patience and thoughtful study.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    I think people should stop picking on Fox, with the methane from the bs they produce we could finally break free of our dependence on imported oil. Tesha, you should be fair and balanced like Fox, list Bushs accomplishments over his first six months. It won't take you long, honest.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Now that would be interesting.....I can not recall ever hearing a complimentary comment from the left about Bush. Not even his wife. Now the left is HOWLING because a Conservative Station is picking on their annointed one.

    Lets get the facts straight.....ACORN, Czars, and the like would never have been brought up if it were not for FOX. And before you left state how ACORN is being picked on and Czars is just a nothing issue they are both being discussed and acted upon by our Congress. Other stations only report the party line. They are TROLLS of the Democratic party.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    ACORN, Czars, Spaceships, Aliens, Secret communist connections, Secret gay connections, evil plots to steal Americans guns, mandatory abortions, elementary school gay marriages, or any other GOP fantasy will only show up on Faux, thats true. Because other channels do not create news, they just report it.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    If ACORN and CZAR is all fantasy then why did ACORN get its funding cut from Congress? Why is the Senate looking into oversight of Czars? Those on the left hate to see the truth when it reflects negatively on them. Too bad.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Keep your foil hat on L_R.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Oh, I'm sure his wife has said something nice about him.

    I still think he would be fun to have a beer with.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    If you call watching him choke on a pretzel "fun."
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Faux News will tell you that they only broadcast news between the hours of 9am-4pm and 6pm-8pm. The rest of the time its opinutainment.

    Fox and Friends, Niel Covoto, Glenn Beck, Bill Orieley, Gretta Von Sustran, and Hanity are all just entertainers according to Faux news Senior Vice President Michael Clamente.

    While you and .5 million people are watching Faux between 6p-8p an average of 6million people are watching each of the three major networks.

    18 million watching real news, 1/2 a million watch the juiced up crazy news on Faux.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    The Conservatives Nixon had a SECRET enemies list used to illegally attack people who did not follow the GOP agenda, President Barrack Obama told a "news" station that he would not appear on there channel if they continued propagandize for the GOP. Big Difference.
  • baseballnh · 1 month ago
    Dennis, you are a moron. After The last 8 years you honestly have the balls to put your name on a letter like this. Shame on you sir! Is the President perfect, no. But the kind of crap you put down on paper is sad. If your conservative fine, but honestly attack with alot better material then this.
  • NHYankee · 1 month ago
    Thank god there are only 1167 days to go!
  • NHYankee · 1 month ago
    Sorry, but if things don't change in 1167 days, the way he and congress are running things we won't be a viable country in 2000 days. We'll all be learning to speak Chinese.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    What pure baloney.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Nothing alarmist in that statement.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Only 2,627 days unless we can get rid of term limits by then
  • kevindumont · 1 month ago
    wow m.j you truly are scary you want to end term limits that is the problem right now as far as i,m concern all politicians should have a 2-term limit and that is it all politicians are bought and paid for especially our commander in chief and he owes big time..
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Obama is bought and paid for because he has been a politician for so long?
  • Ricooooo · 1 month ago
    An advocate for ending term limits, are we mj? Very interesting indeed.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Except for Ronald Reagan, remember after his second term ended, Republicans became nostalgic for those days before presidential term limits.
  • danaknight · 1 month ago
    True journalism does not present opinion, unless stated as such, it presents observed facts and lets the reader develop an opinion. Can Faux News pass this test ? Are you getting all the knbown facts ? If so its your network, otherwise dump them. Murdoch ought to warn once, then fire, any reporter/talking head that does not fact check their material. I think BBC, probably best if you want to know whats going on in the world, followed by our 3 majors, CBS, NBC, ABC who do a resonable job on US news. If you find Faux news calling a lot of people names, using lots of imflamatory rhetoric, and more recently eating their own, you should rethink how long it will be before you are just part of the food chain for them.
  • Sajwert · 1 month ago
    danaknight, I agree with your comment. One of the things I don't understand is how people who claim not to like FOX will also say that they watch Beck, O'Reilly et al for "amusement" and that they enjoy watching them spew their bile over the airwaves. Of course, they also say that they would NEVER believe what they hear.

    I find it unreal that people with intelligence will waste their time watching people like Beck etc. for amusement and listen to what they say and then believe that not one thing they have heard has lodged in their thought processes.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Sajwert,
    I keep tabs on Faux News so I can see what I might be hearing at the water cooler for weeks to come. A LOT of people consume Faux as fact and Faux Knows it. Faux is trying to form the debate by sending out its 1/4 million robot parrots repeating the GOP talking lines.

    My favorite aggregator for the Faux channel is www.newshounds.us
    News Hounds lead story today is a couple of samplings from Faux News' FoxNation Blog page where the Fox Nation moderators let posts like"I wish the Ft. Hood shooter were on capital hill instead" get on the webpage.

    Ignoring this kind of fanaticism would be crazy.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Right, and you listen to Rachael Madcow and Keith Oberman.....you must find them very down to earth Liberals that tell only news. What the hell do they report.....surely is not investigative.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    L_R,
    There are more channels then just the cable ones you know. Most Americans are watching the real networks. PBS, ABC, CBS, and NBC have 97% of the news viewership each night. I suggest you start watching all of these channels instead of the pretend news on the cable channels.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    These stations do a great job of reporting local news and sports. National news is where they lose it.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    mj: Don't foget me at ESPN or, when Sox or Pats are playing, which ever channel is airing the game.

    I get my news from reading various local, national, and international website. Easy way to see what opinions are out there about news stories is to go to memeorandum.com, where you can click on opinions from the left, right, and middle. However, on a slow sports night, I do enjoy the liberal bias of Olbermann and Maddow. Nice to see people with IQs bigger than their shoe size discuss issues.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    LeftyRightie.
    "Rachael Madcow?"

    Don't you know that name calling is childish?

    DUH!!
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    “Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.” Sun Tzu
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Get real. All news is opinionated. Just selecting stories to report requires opinion. Yup, Fox News has opinionated shows and news. So do MSNBC and others. Everyone has their own twist. I suggest listening to several and forming your own. You obviously have your own opinion.....sounds like though you are not very open minded to others???
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    "All news is opinionated." Except that real journalists have standards, professionalism, and ethics to produce real objective news, while Fox deliberately give their opinion, their propaganda.

    That's the giant lie that Fox breeds among the weak minded, that all news is opinionated.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Faux News will tell you that they only broadcast news between the hours of 9am-4pm and 6pm-8pm. The rest of the time its opinutainment.

    Fox and Friends, Niel Covoto, Glenn Beck, Bill Orieley, Gretta Von Sustran, and Hanity are all just entertainers according to Faux news Senior Vice President Michael Clamente.

    While you and .5 million people are watching Faux between 6p-8p an average of 6million people are watching each of the three major networks.

    18 million watching real news, 1/2 a million watch the juiced up crazy news on Faux.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Dennis,
    Our President Barrack Obama sent two additional brigades to Afghanistan immediately after taking office. Brigades that the exiting President would not send.
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promise...
    Imagine if the last President had been as proactive we might not be in Afghanistan or Iraq in the first place.

    To call Faux News biased is not bashing, its honesty. Its a wonder why conservatives and their media wing Faux News is so thinned skin about a little honesty.

    Conservatives remind me of the young kid at the baseball game who says that if you don’t play the game the way I want, then I will take the ball and bat and go home. The GOP and Faux News has spent the last nine months crying and pointing finger instead of rolling up their sleeves and helping resolve these crisis.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Imagine if the last President had been as proactive we might not be in Afghanistan or Iraq in the first place.......where would we be? Hunkered down hoping Al Queda would not bomb us again? Are you going to support Obama if he sends the 40,000 troops McCrystal wants?? Go on take a stand......
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    If the last President had not chose to ignore terrorism and go on vacation for the first eight months we might have a World Trade Center in New York, 7,000+ more Americans, and maybe a functioning economy.

    I supported the President the first time he sent troops to Afghanistan and I support his decision to send 35,000 more troops.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    MJ ...... Now you are blaming Bush for the Trade Towers?? Wow! You need to look a little further back in history about how Bin Laden was in the sights of our CIA but got put on hold while Clinton was on the Golf course. You may not remember that the CIA was downsized by Clinton. Both contributed to the Trade towers coming down.

    Are you copping out....are you going to support Obama if he sends the 40,000 troops McCrystal wants?? Go on take a stand......
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    L_R,
    Now your blaming Clinton for what happened eight months after he left the
    Presidency? How much of Bush's Presidency is Clinton responsible for?
    Yea, the GOP fantasy of Clinton on the golf course, written by a partisan
    hack, with no evidence or corroboration.
    Did Bush expand the CIA in the eight months he was President? Did he not
    know how?
    I understand we needed to create a narrative that kept Bush from accepting
    his responsibility while he was in office, but we have a new President now
    and continuing the charade does no one any good. Imagine if Obama lowered
    the importance level of terrorism the moment he stepped into office and
    then went on vacation. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to
    repeat it."

    I still support the Presidents decision to send 35,000 more troops to
    Afghanistan.
  • Dave · 1 month ago
    Dennis -

    Looks like you hit both the left and right wing extremist hornets nest !!

    I didn't vote for our current prsident, but there is a lot going on right now and he is less than a quarter through his term, so I'd like to give him time to accomplish something tangible.

    However, I think you are absolutely correct about FOX news.
    I've never watched FOX news until recently,
    and that was only due to curiosity generated by all the negative feedback I read on the Telegraph comments sections. I just had to see the "twisted, full of lies, etc" newscast for myself.

    Clearly FOX is not inventing news that does not exist, they just have a very strong opinion on some of their stories. NY shock -jock Howard Stern once boasted about a media survey that revealed listeners who hated him outnumbered listeners who liked him. I think the same thing is true of FOX news; the more people that complain about the coverage, the more new listeners tune in to see what the fuss is all about, which yields more complaints and more viewers. I imagine this type of promotion would normally be very expensive, so the free publicity provided by democrats is reason alone for FOX to maintain it's current opinions.

    Opposition has always been a part of politics, especially in this country where oppostion was the basis for the birth of our nation. Public scrutiny is just another method of checks and balances, which should be welcomed by honest legislators and robust policies and feared by those who place party and special interests above citizens.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Clearly Fox is propaganda. A real news organization does not behave as the opposition.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    As if the mainstream news networks were never opposition to past administrations. MSNBC was the worst offender in the Bush administration, CNN not far behind. And how can one forget Dan Rather trying to affect a presidential election with "evidence" he knew was false...

    If you don't like FoxNews, use the remote...
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    MSNBC is not "mainstream"

    Sorry past administrations had to deal with the truth being broadcast in the news. Nixon didn't like it when caught in lies, and neither did Cheney Bush.

    Sorry the truth has a liberal slant.

    Dan Rather is a great example. It shows that he was ousted by mainstream news for not sticking to real journalism. You will never see that on Fox.

    You only get propaganda on Fox, I don't watch it, but I am compelled to warn folks who do that it is propaganda.
  • msfranbm · 1 month ago
    People who dont watch FOX should to see all the democrats and activist and strategist who work there....how uninformed!!!!
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    You mean like the sex-scandal guy, Morris? Or the PhD who just got fired? Please, give me some names and also give me the number of on-air wingnut trash talkers. Would like to see the fairness and balance.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Try channel 42 or 790 HD depending on what town you live in.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    "Try channel 42 or 790 HD depending on what town you live in."

    Did your antennae just fall off? What question are you answering? What are you talking about?
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    I'm well aware of what you asked for SLR. So I too will type s - l -o-w-l-y. It's called sarcasm...... thought you in all your astuteness would have picked up on that. The channel numbers were so you could tune in yourself and WATCH to get the names of wingnut trash talkers yourself instead of expecting somebody else to serve them up. Duh.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Why , where you can tune in for the names and "number of on-air wingnut trash talkers. Would like to see to fairness and balance." Perhaps msfranbm would like you to do the work yourself.... just trying to be helpful.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    You truly are challenged. In your rush to respond to me, you ignored the context. msfranbm said: "People who dont watch FOX should to see all the democrats and activist and strategist who work there....how uninformed!!!!", to which I responded, in pertinent part, " Please, give me some names and also give me the number of on-air wingnut trash talkers. Would like to see the fairness and balance."

    I'll type s l o w l y in hopes that you can comprehend. I asked for names of the Democrats who work for Fox and the numbers of wingnuts who appear daily to compare those numbers to see if there was balance. You responded to me with channel numbers. Duh?
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Like who again?
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    My problem is not that people watch Fox- it is those people who watch only Fox.

    Would you say that Fox tells a complete enough story to fully inform?
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Well, that's a different story! I watch Fox and I agree with you! Most anti-Fox posters have incorrectly concluded that just because one defends Fox and what they do, that somehow that means that is their ONLY source of information. I have multiple sources from which I get information and I'm quite sure others do as well. I wish the Fox bashers would give it a rest. It's like beating a dead horse. The world basically weighed in on this issue and I don't think the WH came out on top.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    I guess I'm just offended by the low opinion Fox has of its viewers. Calling its treatment of news subjective is like calling Nicole Smith's wardrobe feminine.

    We get it, already.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Like a lot of us were offended with being fed Michael Jackson 24/7 for DAYS on end and treating David Letterman's sex scandal as somehow being NEWS headline news.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Did you happen to see the insulting use of inflated figures on Hannity?

    I must refer you to the Daily Show as the source because the other MSM are too cowardly to insist on standards from Fox. But they have evidence, and they usually do to back their jabs.

    http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911100063
  • NHYankee · 1 month ago
    Thank you Dennis. Keep writing letters and speaking your mind without fear. The fact that more and more people everyday are pointing out that "the emperor has no clothes" is making Obama's left-wing wacko worshipers very unhappy and increasingly shrill. Expect the same old tired group of retired and unemployed nattering nabobs who spend every day, all day here to attack you on full force!
  • DENNISFROMNASHUA · 1 month ago
    It's interesting with the new setup for comments that you can now see the number of times certain individuals post comments. You are right that the same people are posting comments. Some of these individuals have posted over 2,500 comments. I guess they have nothing else to do in their lives. Anyone interested in checking the number of comments posted by an individual just click the little face next to their name.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    It's interesting that right wingers don't comment so much,

    is it possible they have nothing to say that can advance any of their assertions or arguments?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    I've said before that I would really like to hear from true conservatives. My conservative family members and friends are fed up with the rhetoric and what the entertainers are doing to their party.
  • DENNISFROMNASHUA · 1 month ago
    The same people posting comments on various subjects. Just click the little face next to their name and you will see many of them have posted over 2,500 comments. I guess they have little else to do in their daily lives. In some way one feels sorry for them if this is their only outlet in life.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    2671 comments thank you, and you have been able to think of three things to say in two months? I feel sorry for you.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    DfromN: In typical fashion of those who like to use out of context tidbits to advance their out of context ideas, you mention numbers of posts without reference to what time period it covers. Is it over years or do you think that people have posted 2,500 comments today?

    And, you are behind the times, as usual. The Disqus function has always had that information available. Pity you just found it today. Must have those old conservative blinders on over your ViewMaster.

    Why not just be honest and write a letter that states that there is nothing that Obama could do to be Presidential in your blind eyes. Instead, you think you have presented a cogent position to to mask your bias. You have not. Why not have the courage of your preconceptions?

    You said: "He reminds me of the young kid at the baseball game who says that if you don’t play the game the way I want, then I will take the ball and bat and go home. " You must have the President confused with the Congressional Republicans who have done exactly that since they lost the majority, including their shameful behavior in the House Saturday night, or the times they have walked out of the House in protest, or like last week, left an important hearing for the same reason.

    It is you I pity.
  • dennisfromnashua · 1 month ago
    You asked the question of what time period the many comments were posted. This is a question only you and the others can answer. Sarcasm is cute on TV, but not in response to a letter or blog. You state that there is nothing our President could do to be Presidential in my eyes. You are so wrong. I raised the point of not making a decision for almost three months for the request of our military leaders, and now NATO to send more troops to Afghaniston. Tonight we see on the Telegraph online that he is close to making a decision. If you had loved one that was killed in Afganiston during our President's time of making a decision, how would you feel? Do I support our President you ask. I did not vote for him, but I have hoped and prayed that he would do a good job. The important issues of the war and Afghanistan and unemployment have not been addressed by the President in my opinion. Remember we are all entitled to our opinion. Leave sarcasm where it belongs on TV.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Dennis,
    Why did you neglect to mention that Obama has already provided troops to Afghanistan? Didn't fit your agenda?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    "You asked the question of what time period the many comments were posted. This is a question only you and the others can answer."

    Good grief, man, you need to pay attention. You can scroll through the comments and find out for yourself. Again, half-informed, making mis-statements. Not surprised.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    dfromn: Where was the sarcasm? My, my you are sensitive. And, you must think that you are the moderator, too. You, too, are entitled to your opinion but not to the opinions of others or how they are expressed. In language you can understand, "You are not the boss of me".

    My advice to you is to stop couching your criticisms as support for the troops. Your letter mentioned the time a thoughtful President is taking making the decision to send more soldiers in harms way. If the time he is taking doesn't suit you, tough. I trust his judgment far more than any opinion you might have. It is pitiful that you would invoke concern for the troops as reason for your screed. You are a phony who doesn't man up to your own agenda and squeals like a kid on the playground when someone challenges you.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Wow, how long did it take you to come up with so much mockery in 3 sentences? Nice to know that you like to categorize and label those with whom you disagree. You fit the mold of follower of the Emperors Beck and Limbaugh. Even sound like them. You must be proud to be a good parrot. And, your postings are always good for a chuckle.

    Gotta go now. Must finish reading the "Stealing Money from Wingnuts' Pockets" guide. I'm at the chapter about "Being Shrill and Loving It". Next chapters are "Nattering 101" and "Party All the Time - Nabob Nightlife on Wingnuts' Dime".
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    SLRNashuan - So you are unemployed, collecting welfare, and staying at home. Keep reading your get rich quick books but if you really want more money go get a job.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Naw, don't have time for a job. I'm too busy trying to figure out how to raid your 401K before the Republicans and their corporate master drain it further.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Our Military leaders asked for more troops and this is why Obama sent two brigades to Afghanistan immediately after taking office, and now has committed to 35,000 more troops.

    The rate of unemployment is a symptom of the destroyed economy President Obama inherited from the previous President. Obama immediately signed a stimulus bill that has stopped our slide into a depression and is already showing signs of a recovery.

    During all this great effort the President has had to endure a continuous litany of made up problems by the petulant little cable channel Faux News. The President spent five minutes explaining that he would no longer take this completely bias GOP propaganda attacks from the Republican media arm. Since then Faux has devoted all its time to crying victim.

    It is the childish right and Faux News who have the thin skin in this story. And as long as conservatives play lame and lay in the way of progress in a temper tantrum we will all suffer.

    My wish is that the right start acting like more like Americans and less like partisan right wing cry babies. Its time for the right to give up their petty childish temper tantrums and join the heavy lifting that its going to take to get this country back on its feet.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    When did Obama commit to sending 35,000 troops? This is from today's news:

    "White House National Security Adviser retired Gen. Jim Jones issued a rare public statement Monday vehemently denying media reports that suggest President Obama has privately decided to send close to 40,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan."

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/09/afghanis...
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    seamus,
    This story is something, did you read it?
    Its claiming that the Pentagon leaked this fake story yesterday to
    undermine the President?
    I hope conservative in the Pentagon are not planing on overthrowing the
    government.........
    I'm going to stick to my claim that Obama has already committed to send the
    troops. The United States is negotiatingwith NATO, trying to get them to
    man up a little by committing troops and this is the cause for the delay in
    the announcement.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    Then you provide a link that shows that proves that Obama has "committed to 35,000 more troops" as you posted. You are either misinformed or making this stuff up. The military is still waiting for a decision as it has since August. Put up or shut up....
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    You've seen the reports so you know I'm not making it up. I will not be told to shut up by anyone.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    mjhealey - Sheer speculation the Pentagon leaked a fake story. Misinforamation is being spread. As far as the overthrow of the Government by the Pentagon....more gibberish. And as far as NATO ponying up more Troops for Afghanistan.....rather they are all still laughing at the great buffoon. They may each send a token amount but very little.

    I wonder if the greath Messiah will go for the McCrystal light in Afghnistan and second guess his Generals rather than give them what they ask for. If he does cut the troop numbers I hope McCrystal just says go find yourself another PATSY and resigns. I would not be surprised if that is the reason the Obummer has not decided.....trying to figure out what McCrystal and other Generals will do if he does not support them and what the Public fallout will be.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Who is the great buffoon? Bush? Would they STILL be laughing at him?

    Do you not know how the military works or which direction orders flow? You
    might want to educate yourself.

    You have to admit that the Generals must feel a lot more comfortable with
    this President compared with the last's indecisiveness.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    "compared with the last's indecisiveness".

    General McChrystal asked for more troops in August, 2009.
    We still do not have an answer from the Obama administration.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Obama has five months to decide faster than our last President. Don't worry Obama is no where near as indecisive as Republicans and you won't have to wait that long.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Mj......First I was an Officer in the USAF and certainly know all about the chain of command. I have many Military friends.....virtually NONE I know think much of Obama. And, considering Obama's lack of communication with his Generals in the field does not give me warm fuzzies about his resolve, decision making, and real care about our troops overseas.
  • MsOreally · 4 weeks ago
    LR, virtually NO military that I know think much of BO either. BTW, thank you for your service and Happy Veteran's Day!
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Did you communicate directly with the President when you were in the Air
    Force? Did the President do what ever you told him to do?

    You certainly cannot be comparing Obama to the last President because if
    you were you would have to admit he cares about the troops overseas much
    more than Bush. Obama did not send our solders into war under manned, under
    protected, and without a exit plan.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    MJ - Actually I did speak with the President...not Bush.... His call sign was "Headancer" if I recall correctly. It was during the tail end of Vietnam. The President called to thank us while we were flying the last in country mission. And, yet Soldiers normally follow the chain of command. The President and superiors jump ranks when they want.

    As far as care about the Troops.....the ones I know do not care for Obama and by far thought that Bush was a more caring President. Obama is still thinking with his finger stuck up his ....... Probably thinking about the political ramnifications if he goes forth in Afghanistan.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Actually L_R,
    Generals don't get to jump rank unless its down.
    I didn't ask if you spoke to a President, I asked if he took orders from you. Of course not.
    That your conservative friends dislike the President of the United States does not concern me.
    That you and your friends let your ideology get in front of your Country is pretty suspect though.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    "While you and .5 million people are watching Faux between 6p-8p an average of 6million people are watching each of the three major networks."

    I'm guessing you scanned over my post. I don't buy into anyones political agenda, right or left, I have always operated on the assumption that people make their best decisions when they have the best information. As a matter of course I tend to ignore shills from either side as they are inefficient sources for the information I would seek. It's not good to make policy based on who had the best snide remark, or who mocked the other better. I make an honest effort to see an issue from all possible angles without predispostion either way. There are times when I think the Republican position turns out to be correct, and sometimes the Democrats are. For these reasons among others Fox disqualifies itself as a source for me.
    Lest there be any further confusion, my suggesting Tesha post Bushs accomplishments for his six months was pointing out that (if memory serves) Bush wasn't very productive in his first six months.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    TrulyFeral - I think you should check your Fox News audience numbers. ....... they are waaayyyy more than 500,000. Now who has more viewers.... depends what you are talking about. The higher numbers at other stations represent LOCAL news.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    LeftyRighty, those numbers were someone elses who hit reply to mine instead of yours by mistake, they have likely seen your response, if that will save you some typing.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Only 500,000 watch the news on Faux, this number does not include the entertainment portion which includes but is not limited to Beck, Hennity, Oreally, Faux and Friends, Gretta, etc.
    The 18,000,0000 real news channel viewers are also only including the news on ABC, CBS, and NBC.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    If only 500,000 people watch Fox then making any comment about Fox would be absurd as it would be too small a audience to even consider. But, I do not believe that number. I have listened to the Left twist the figures around too much. As far as I am concerned believe 500,000 if you wish.....I just don't buy into that number.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    I was actually trying to respond to a LeftyRighty post and missed. The new layout is taking some effort to get use to. Does not negate your response, good stuff.
  • Sajwert · 1 month ago
    I agree that the problems with the WH and FOX station is a bit of an embarrassment. However, I think that the problem lies in the fact that some of FOX station have been saying some of the most disreputable things about this president that I've ever heard from a public figure. That President Obama has about had it with those who seem hell bent to twist almost anything he does short of how he brushes his teeth into a major crisis, seems fairly reasonable to me.

    I am deeply grateful that he is taking his time to hold discussions, get other opinions and, in general, act in a manner that shows the gravity of the situation of whether it is best to increase the Afghanistan troop levels or not. As the marvelous Constitutional commentator, George Will said recently on "This Week with George Stephanopolis" , he would have been much happier had President Bush took his time and, using Cheney's word "dither", did a bit more "dithering" before plunging the USA into an unnecessary war.

    If you think that President Obama can personally get the job market up and running again, then you are giving him far more credit than he could possible deserve. That is what the "free market" is supposed to do. Make jobs available. However, during the past 8 years, people who should have been awake at the switch were not, and deregulation appears to have given license to every sort of financial abuse that Wall Street and the Banks both big and small, could think up to get more profit and ignore the danger of what they were doing should the market go deep south. I honestly don't believe anyone over 7 yrs old would assume that President Obama would be able to do in 10 months to change the economic and job situation what has taken a great number of years to tear apart.

    The problem with Nixon was excessive paranoia. And just because one is paranoid enough to think that another is out to get you, doesn't mean they are not out to get you. Every time I think of how China has bailed us out again and again, and the shops in USA are loaded with China's goods, I think of how Nixon helped to bring this about. Nixon was not always wrong about everything.

    And President Obama is acting very presidential to my way of thinking. That you think he is similar to that boy at a baseball game is your problem, and I think you are being both short-sighted and biased to the point no matter what President Obama does or says, you will disapprove.

    Now, I admit that I occasionally watch Shepherd Smith, as I really do think he is a newsman. I would, as I've said before, eat ground glass before listening to Beck, O'Reilly, Ann Coulter and some of the others who are dishing out personal opinions and having the audacity to call it "news reporting".

    And I wish I had the power to shut those people up permanently any way short of violence. I wish President Obama had that power. Neither of us do. More the pity.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    So, you would like Obama to shut up news that does not shed a good light on him and his policies. Please let me thank our fore fathers for the Constitution that allows free speech. What you are supporting is the formation of Tyrannical Dictatorships........ even you on the left are not that stupid....are you??

    As for Presidential....I hope Obama has learned from the Cambridge Police a "teachable moment" not to interfere in such matters. Another one of his many blunders....what a fool.....what was he thinking in trying to protect his Professor friend and after admittantly saying he did not know the facts....

  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    You have no worries, Fox went to court, former employees of Fox took them to court because Fox told them to deliberately lie, and the decision was that lying is constitutional. Fox's right to lie to the public is safe.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Not appearing on a third rate cable channel does not equate to censorship L_R.
  • tomp · 1 month ago
    I believe that the Obama cultists are only following the examples of other socialists in regards to shutting down news organiozations that do not polish the halo of their "Dear Leader".

    The Soviets only had Pravda and their own on-air "news" organizations. No one was allowed to buck the 'party line. If anyone did, then not only were they shut down, but the reporters were never heard from again. They are onlu following in the foorsteps of Kim Il in North Korea. Absolutely no there one is allowed to say anything aainst that dspot. They are following ion the footsteps of Fidel Castro in Cuba. No one in Cuba is allowed to say anything against the ole cigar chomper.
    They are following in the footsteps of the Red Chinese. Ask anyone in Tibet.
    More currently, they are following the example of Chavez and his gang of thugs.:
    "Chavez Closes 34 Radio Stations" (
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/02/world... )
    "Chavez cancels opposition TV station's license" (http://www.unknownnews.org/070106-Chavez-RCTV.html )

    Meantime the Obama sheeples are giggling over calling Fox News... "Faux News".
    Hope and Change? Obamaists are "hoping" that they can "change" the Fouth Estate into one of the shining examples I gave above.

    ---Tom P
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    bahahahahahahah

    oh, good joke TomP

    Obama ruins Fox by refusing to appear on their shows... hahahahahaha
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Fox laughing all the way to the bank.......bahahahahahahaha
  • Tesha · 1 month ago
    How do you like getting taken?
  • MsOreally · 4 weeks ago
    Depends on what the definition of taken is.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Obama refusing to go on a cable news channel for two months is just like it was in Russia, China, and Cuba. No exaggeration there.
  • BigDaddyNH · 1 month ago
    From the letterwritter:
    "Respected Democrats are amazed at these comments about Fox News."
    C'mon, since when have any of you righties used "respected" and "democrats" in the same sentence?
  • msfranbm · 1 month ago
    Hey TOMMY...RIGHT WING?? Fox news has more democrats activist and strategist working there than CBS NBC ABC CNN MSNBC ALL TOGETHER!! daaaaaaa gesh you should watch it before you throw out mis-information...want names?
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Yes, please- I would.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Yes, I would like names. Did you not offer?
  • walstib · 1 month ago
    "Oh crap, someone called me on my bluff"
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Hey, Mr. Dennis M. Bowes: There is a not-so-bright-or-clever guy writing LTEs to the NT and signing your name. Just thought you should know.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    If Obama wants to act presidential, he ought to start pronouncing the word nuclear as "noocooler." He ought to start torturing prisoners and then lying about it.

    He ought to start talking about how litigation is preventing OBGYN's from practicing the love they have for their patients.

    He ought to start an unecessary war, give tax breaks to people who don't need it, and increase the national debt by 40 percent.

    Then the conservatives would love him. (No, they'd still bash him on Fox 24/7)





  • baxterlaiken · 1 month ago
    We're a year in now so it would be a good time to let obama make or break his own record. Continuing to look back at bush just makes you look irrelevant and silly.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
  • nhproud · 1 month ago
    mjh, how true, and I admonish you and your fellow democrats who have already forgotten 9/11. Obama is making our country less safe, and i pray that he will finally govern form the center and stop listening to the extreme left wing of the Democratic Party. If there are any moderates left in the Democratic Party, I beg you to stand up and stop this insanity, or like mjh states, we are bound to repeat history.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    nhproud: Nobody in this country has forgotten 9/11. You should be ashamed of yourself for making that comment. You and many other rightwingnuts who have the audacity to use 9/11 references to make your sad, misguided political points are an affront to people like myself who had friends and colleagues in the Towers. A pox upon you.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Obama has currently kept more Americans civilians alive longer than Bush did.
    Obama has keep America safer than Bush.
    Democrats are the moderates in this country.
    Thankfully Obama has learned what devastation a "weak on terrorism President" like Bush can cause and he did not choose to ignore terrorism like the last President.
  • Ricooooo · 1 month ago
    And Obama has presided over the worst massacre on a military base on US soil in history. No terrorist attacks after 9/11 while Bush was in office but you can score 1 for Obama. Mmm...mmm...mmm.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Guess MJ has not heard about Fort Hood......was that not a Terrorist attack? I suppose that was Bush's fault also.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    L_R,
    Your claiming to know this was a terrorist attack? You've never needed facts to jump to conclusions before, why start now?
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Ricooo,
    Your point is after Bush let us down the first time, he didn't let us down again. Interesting argument.

    1 for Obama? Do you know of a terrorist attack that I don't?
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    i'm using your logic and following your lead to make my points. It wasn't Obama's fault, ok? How he reacts IS up to him though. It's not much of a leap to callit a terrorism attack. Why are YOU so quick to say it isn't? Where is the evidence to the contrary that nullifies what they know right now?

    Skipping to your post below, I kow what ALLAHU AKBAR means. It's the CONTEXT in which it's said, mj. When it's followed by a bomb or other, similar mayhem (after months or years of planning same, to boot)- not nice.
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    Ricooo,
    When in crisis the effort is not just to react quickly, but to react correctly. The shooter has been subdued, the base is secure, why are you so willing to guess when we can wait a few days and know?

    I was in Israel and had just gone through security and was standing in the plaza in front of the Wailing Wall . I had spent most of my trip in Tel Aviv which was secure but had mush less military presence then where I was. Flak Jackets, rifles, metal detectors and road blocks where every where in Jerusalem. As I stood alone in the court yard they started the Muslim call to prayers by tapping severl times on the P.A. "Pop" "Pop" "Pop", I nearly hit the ground.

    My point is, its not good enough to just to react, you have to react correctly.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    The shooter has been subdued, the base is secure, why are you so willing to guess when we can wait a few days and know?



    It's been a week.  We know.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    mj mj mj...

    Are you old enough to recall the attacks in 1993 upon the same targets in NYC? 1993... Hmmm- who was pres then?

    Bush was pres for less than 9 months. Was he privvy to intelligence and was there chatter? Yes. But i submit that Clinton is equally, if not more to blame for 9/11. So if you want to play that game....

    Terrorist attacks since Jan of this year, on US soil? Yes, i do. So do you know of it.
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    Do you ever trip with all that tangled logic in your head?
    9/11 is Clinton fault because Bush was a slow starter.
    You've jumped to the conclusion that F.t. Hood was a terrorist attack but its Obama's fault be cause he is so much smarter than Bush?

    So, Republicans will never accept responsibility unless its for something positive, did I summarize that correctly?
  • BigDaddyNH · 1 month ago
    Score 1 for Obama? Is massacre of US citizens a game for you? Ricooooo this is a new low, even by your standards.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    A game? Tell that to those here that are making excuses and not calling this what it is: a terror attack from within.
  • walstib · 1 month ago
    You're delusional. If you really believe that Obama somehow "allowed" this to happen for the simple reason that he was in office when it happened, then there is something seriously wrong with your logic and reasoning skills. That's hyperbole at its epic.

    In fact it's starting to look like the Army screwed this one up on their own by missing glaring warning signs and flat out ignoring behavior that should have called this guy's sanity into question. What's worse is they allowed it continue and last I checked mid-level Army officers don't run their decisions by the president before acting on them.

    Moron.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    Whoa there, walstib. My post was in response to another. I didn't say Obama "allowed" this to happen. Politically correct policies allowed this to happen. "He's saying some bad stuff, but... he's a Muslim, and how would it look if we complained?"

    Instead, how does it look when nothing was done? 13 dead, dozens wounded.

    But at least we didn't insult him.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    walstib: Shhhh. Don't let Coocoo know that the authorities has Hasan under scrutiny for over a year. Then he will figure out who was president at the time causing his head to explode.

    On second thought, cancel the "shhhh".
  • walstib · 4 weeks ago
    Bull. I know full well how to read. If you were talking about "policies" you would have talked about "policies" and not tied only Obama's name to what happened at Ft. Hood, as if to imply he or his policies somehow contributed. They didn't. Army internals blew this one. If you've been keeping up on the issue you would know that by now.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Idiot.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    Means so much coming from you SLR. Really!
  • woodysix8 · 1 month ago
    Dude you are overdue for your depression medication.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    I don't think their was anything depressing about my post. If anything its good news to finally have a President who knows which end is up.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    "You don't know anything about Hasan version of Islam. Maybe your guessing
    right, but your just guessing."

    I know what i hear and read. The evidence- as we know it to be at this point- speaks clearly.

    Latest: seems he was wiring his paychecks to Pakistan. He made $90K/year and it seems he had nothing to show for it- not in his apartment anyway. He gave away all his posessions and, as is the ritual for muslim terrorists apparently, visited a strip club for 7 hours. I guess he was getting worked up for them 72 virgins, huh?

    There are also interviews with co-parishoners (correct term?) of his from his mosque, praising his actions and condemning the victims of those actions.

    Do you really have doubts as to the motive behind his attack? You don't have to answer here; I'd rather you think about it and answer in your own mind.
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    Is Nidal Malik Hasan a "Terrorist"?
    http://www.slate.com/id/2235361/

    But this might be the smoking gun
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,574546,00.html

    I know its exciting to guess the ending of a book before you get there. I
    would suggest it doesn't mean you should stop reading the book.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    Me attack some poor muslim dude? Nah. In fact, if i hear that phrase shouted in public, i'm going the other way, mj. I'd rather look like a fool and live to endure your ridicule then be hamburger and have you think: "well, i guess the magic 8-ball was right on for once."
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    I'm not above being scared Ricoo. I'm just saying we don't need the fear to drive our decisions.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    Fear shouldn't drive decisions- agreed.  Nor should fear prevent us from acting.



    Every American should be angry.  Angry at Hasan.  Angry at his twisted version of Islam.  Angry at ourselves and our inability to "call it like it is" and for letting political correctness get in the way of safety and sound policy.



    More and more, people are afraid to speak up; don't want to offend, now do we?  Well, I'm offended at what that's gotten us.  Most recently- Ft. Hood.
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    You don't know anything about Hasan version of Islam. Maybe your guessing
    right, but your just guessing.
  • Ricooooo · 4 weeks ago
    "Your calling Ft Hood a terrorist attack? Did you decide this or did your imam tell you?"

    I just paid attention to the details, mj. Then, i used logic and reason to come to a conclusion.

    "my imam"? Sorry to have to inform you, but i don't have an imam.

    But, mj- a little advice: If ever you find yourself in public and someone shouts out "ALLAHU AKBAR", and starts to dial a cell phone, or pulls out a gun- you just go ahead and stand there and contemplate whether this is a) a terrorist attack, b) Ric0o0oo0o's imagination running wild once again or c) none of the above.

    In the meantime, we'll miss you around here.

    Just because you refuse to see things for what they are, why must you insult those of us who choose to?
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    I wonder why we ever investigate anything if we could just ask Ricooo "The human magic eight ball"

    And before you accidentally attack some poor Muslim dude you might want to know that the phrase "ALLAHU AKBAR" means " God is the greatest" and your just as likely to hear someone who speaks Arabic say it when when they are happy or wish to express approval, when they want to praise a speaker, and even during times of extreme stress or euphoria. Its the "Oh my God!" of the Muslim world.

    Your the poster child for the saying "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing."
  • Ricooooo · 1 month ago
    "How many terrorist attacks have happened so far under Obama's Presidency? "

    Fort Hood ring a bell MJ?

    DOES IT???!!!
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Ric0o0oo0o,
    Your calling Ft Hood a terrorist attack? Did you decide this or did your imam tell you?
    Your a faster chicken little then the Bush administration was, Who are we going to invade this time? Iran?

    I know this stuff can be scary for someone like you, but you might want to hold off on jumping to conclusions. You see how much trouble reacting without thinking the last administration got us into.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    MJ - You say Obama is stronger on anti-terrorism......you must be on something very strong. Your statements is utterly rediculous.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    How many terrorist attacks have happened so far under Obama's Presidency? How many have been stopped? Seems his kickin butt in the defense of the Nation category . You want to argue otherwise?
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    We are ten months in, your inabilty to count makes you irrelevant and stupid.
  • Just_Wondering · 1 month ago
    I wish I had thought of this quote I heard on the 96.9 talk radio the other day: "If Obama's skin were any thinner, he would have a reservoir tip". I really laughed hard at that one.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Good analogy- provides protection, promotes national health.
  • Nashuan02468 · 1 month ago
    Disgard after one use.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Gotta admit- good one.
  • big_g · 4 weeks ago
    What do we expect from a CHICAGO COMMUNITY ORGANIZER,, he is used to leading his people around by thier noses and getting his way only,, That is why he is called 'THE SAVIOR".. LOL
    The reason for all the CZAR's is plain and simple,, they are like minded as he is and not like the leaders that comgress has approved.. There stail are opening for congressional appointments in the departs in DC. But his CZARs are there so no need to rush into them.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Soooooooooo what? I'm off to a Veteran's ceremony now. So won't be able to respond again in what you might consider a timely fashion. Just wanted to let you know.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Must have been a short ceremony since you responded to me just minutes ago.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    It started at 1100 and is five minutes from my house...... two color guards, one Navy speaker.
    Ran into a friend who has a son in the USMC and stationed in Iraq and another son in the USAF. Glad I went.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    A couple of hours ago at Fort Hood, the President spoke at the memorial. THIS is Presidential:


    We come together filled with sorrow for the thirteen Americans that we have lost; with gratitude for the lives that they led; and with a determination to honor them through the work we carry on.

    This is a time of war. And yet these Americans did not die on a foreign field of battle. They were killed here, on American soil, in the heart of this great American community. It is this fact that makes the tragedy even more painful and even more incomprehensible.

    For those families who have lost a loved one, no words can fill the void that has been left. We knew these men and women as soldiers and caregivers. You knew them as mothers and fathers; sons and daughters; sisters and brothers.

    But here is what you must also know: your loved ones endure through the life of our nation. Their memory will be honored in the places they lived and by the people they touched. Their life’s work is our security, and the freedom that we too often take for granted. Every evening that the sun sets on a tranquil town; every dawn that a flag is unfurled; every moment that an American enjoys life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – that is their legacy.

    Neither this country – nor the values that we were founded upon – could exist without men and women like these thirteen Americans. And that is why we must pay tribute to their stories.

    Chief Warrant Officer Michael Cahill had served in the National Guard and worked as a physician’s assistant for decades. A husband and father of three, he was so committed to his patients that on the day he died, he was back at work just weeks after having a heart attack.

    Major Libardo Eduardo Caraveo spoke little English when he came to America as a teenager. But he put himself through college, earned a PhD, and was helping combat units cope with the stress of deployment. He is survived by his wife, sons and step-daughters.

    Staff Sergeant Justin DeCrow joined the Army right after high school, married his high school sweetheart, and had served as a light wheeled mechanic and Satellite Communications Operator. He was known as an optimist, a mentor, and a loving husband and father.

    After retiring from the Army as a Major, John Gaffaney cared for society’s most vulnerable during two decades as a psychiatric nurse. He spent three years trying to return to active duty in this time of war, and he was preparing to deploy to Iraq as a Captain. He leaves behind a wife and son.

    Specialist Frederick Greene was a Tennessean who wanted to join the Army for a long time, and did so in 2008 with the support of his family. As a combat engineer he was a natural leader, and he is survived by his wife and two daughters.

    Specialist Jason Hunt was also recently married, with three children to care for. He joined the Army after high school. He did a tour in Iraq, and it was there that he re-enlisted for six more years on his 21st birthday so that he could continue to serve.

    Staff Sergeant Amy Krueger was an athlete in high school, joined the Army shortly after 9/11, and had since returned home to speak to students about her experience. When her mother told her she couldn’t take on Osama bin Laden by herself, Amy replied: “Watch me.”

    Private First Class Aaron Nemelka was an Eagle Scout who just recently signed up to do one of the most dangerous jobs in the service – diffuse bombs – so that he could help save lives. He was proudly carrying on a tradition of military service that runs deep within his family.

    Private First Class Michael Pearson loved his family and loved his music, and his goal was to be a music teacher. He excelled at playing the guitar, and could create songs on the spot and show others how to play. He joined the military a year ago, and was preparing for his first deployment.

    Captain Russell Seager worked as a nurse for the VA, helping veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress. He had great respect for the military, and signed up to serve so that he could help soldiers cope with the stress of combat and return to civilian life. He leaves behind a wife and son.

    Private Francheska Velez, the daughter of a father from Colombia and a Puerto Rican mother, had recently served in Korea and in Iraq, and was pursuing a career in the Army. When she was killed, she was pregnant with her first child, and was excited about becoming a mother.

    Lieutenant Colonel Juanita Warman was the daughter and granddaughter of Army veterans. She was a single mother who put herself through college and graduate school, and served as a nurse practitioner while raising her two daughters. She also left behind a loving husband.

    Private First Class Kham Xiong came to America from Thailand as a small child. He was a husband and father who followed his brother into the military because his family had a strong history of service. He was preparing for his first deployment to Afghanistan.

    These men and women came from all parts of the country. Some had long careers in the military. Some had signed up to serve in the shadow of 9/11. Some had known intense combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, and some cared for those did. Their lives speak to the strength, the dignity and the decency of those who serve, and that is how they will be remembered.

    That same spirit is embodied in the community here at Fort Hood, and in the many wounded who are still recovering. In those terrible minutes during the attack, soldiers made makeshift tourniquets out of their clothes. They braved gunfire to reach the wounded, and ferried them to safety in the backs of cars and a pick-up truck.

    One young soldier, Amber Bahr, was so intent on helping others that she did not realize for some time that she, herself, had been shot in the back. Two police officers – Mark Todd and Kim Munley – saved countless lives by risking their own. One medic – Francisco de la Serna – treated both Officer Munley and the gunman who shot her.

    It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this tragedy. But this much we do know – no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor. And for what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice – in this world, and the next.

    These are trying times for our country. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the same extremists who killed nearly 3,000 Americans continue to endanger America, our allies, and innocent Afghans and Pakistanis. In Iraq, we are working to bring a war to a successful end, as there are still those who would deny the Iraqi people the future that Americans and Iraqis have sacrificed so much for.

    As we face these challenges, the stories of those at Fort Hood reaffirm the core values that we are fighting for, and the strength that we must draw upon. Theirs are tales of American men and women answering an extraordinary call – the call to serve their comrades, their communities, and their country. In an age of selfishness, they embody responsibility. In an era of division, they call upon us to come together. In a time of cynicism, they remind us of who we are as Americans.

    We are a nation that endures because of the courage of those who defend it. We saw that valor in those who braved bullets here at Fort Hood, just as surely as we see it in those who signed up knowing that they would serve in harm’s way.

    We are a nation of laws whose commitment to justice is so enduring that we would treat a gunman and give him due process, just as surely as we will see that he pays for his crimes.

    We are a nation that guarantees the freedom to worship as one chooses. And instead of claiming God for our side, we remember Lincoln’s words, and always pray to be on the side of God.

    We are a nation that is dedicated to the proposition that all men and women are created equal. We live that truth within our military, and see it in the varied backgrounds of those we lay to rest today. We defend that truth at home and abroad, and we know that Americans will always be found on the side of liberty and equality. That is who we are as a people.

    Tomorrow is Veterans Day. It is a chance to pause, and to pay tribute – for students to learn of the struggles that preceded them; for families to honor the service of parents and grandparents; for citizens to reflect upon the sacrifices that have been made in pursuit of a more perfect union.

    For history is filled with heroes. You may remember the stories of a grandfather who marched across Europe; an uncle who fought in Vietnam; a sister who served in the Gulf. But as we honor the many generations who have served, I think all of us – every single American – must acknowledge that this generation has more than proved itself the equal of those who have come before.

    We need not look to the past for greatness, because it is before our very eyes.
    This generation of soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen have volunteered in a time of certain danger. They are part of the finest fighting force that the world has ever known. They have served tour after tour of duty in distant, different and difficult places. They have stood watch in blinding deserts and on snowy mountains. They have extended the opportunity of self-government to peoples that have suffered tyranny and war. They are man and woman; white, black, and brown; of all faiths and stations – all Americans, serving together to protect our people, while giving others half a world away the chance to lead a better life.

    In today’s wars, there is not always a simple ceremony that signals our troops’ success – no surrender papers to be signed, or capital to be claimed. But the measure of their impact is no less great – in a world of threats that no know borders, it will be marked in the safety of our cities and towns, and the security and opportunity that is extended abroad. And it will serve as testimony to the character of those who serve, and the example that you set for America and for the world.

    Here, at Fort Hood, we pay tribute to thirteen men and women who were not able to escape the horror of war, even in the comfort of home. Later today, at Fort Lewis, one community will gather to remember so many in one Stryker Brigade who have fallen in Afghanistan.

    Long after they are laid to rest – when the fighting has finished, and our nation has endured; when today’s servicemen and women are veterans, and their children have grown – it will be said of this generation that they believed under the most trying of tests; that they persevered not just when it was easy, but when it was hard; and that they paid the price and bore the burden to secure this nation, and stood up for the values that live in the hearts of all free peoples.

    So we say goodbye to those who now belong to eternity. We press ahead in pursuit of the peace that guided their service. May God bless the memory of those we lost. And may God bless the United States of America.
  • dennisofnashua · 1 month ago
    Yes he was presidential today, but insensitive last Thursday. When they have tiime his people can get it straight for the teleprompter. Too bad they didn't take more time last Thusrday when they put the words in the teleprompter.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Boy, dofn, you and msoreally sure have to scrape the bottom of your imaginations to find your outrage.

    Last week, while the tragedy was unfolding, the President was at an conference of Native American Nations. He spoke at the beginning of the meeting and was scheduled to do the wrap-up at the end. I thought he acted appropriately when he made a few congratulatory remarks but did not deliver his prepared remarks and instead made brief comments about Ft. Hood, and left the gathering immediately. He did not do his usual ropeline handshakes or socializing. He was being briefed on an ongoing event - the base was still on lock down - and should not have made any speculation or detailed comments.

    Exactly what should he have done to please you?
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Speak to the tragedy of the fallen....... FIRST
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    OhReally?,
    Your first comment on the subject was more than 24 hours after the incident, should we hold you with even more disdain than you for our President?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    WRONG! He was correct to speak of the event - which was news to many of those present who were in meetings all day and unaware - after making brief remarks about the purpose of his being there. I can just hear you screeching now if he'd reversed the order . . . "How could the President mention anything else after making the Ft. Hood statements? How insensitive."

    You represent the tragedy of the bitter.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    It is amazing what a speechwriter and a teleprompter can do.... We see the real Obama when he talks without a speech. "Typical white person". The Cambridge police were stupid.... Here is the latest:

    "Well, look, we -- we have seen, in the past, rampages of this sort. And in a country of 300 million people, there are going to be acts of violence that are inexplicable. Even within the extraordinary military that we have -- and I think everybody understands how outstanding the young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress -- there are going to be instances in which an individual cracks. I think the questions that we're asking now and we don't have yet complete answers to is, is this an individual who's acting in this way or is it some larger set of actors? You know, what are the motivations? Those are all questions that I think we have to ask ourselves. Until we have these answers buttoned down, I'd rather not comment on it."

    So, Hasan may have cracked from the stress, but we do not have any answers so he should not comment on it, but he just did.... Who is he trying to appease with these comments about the Fort Hood terror attack?
  • nhproud · 1 month ago
    Seamusnh, exactly. Obama is a consumate politician, alway in the campaign mode, catch him without his teleprompt, and the truth is revealed. Just ask Joe the Plumber and how Obama will re-distribute wealth. How presidential is he off camera? Not very I suspect
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Why is your standard of proof Joe the Plumber? Is he up there with Rush and Glenn and Ann as spokespeople for the opposition?

    That's pretty sad.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Yes, seamusnh, it is amazing. Like the shout out to Dr Joe.......... compliments of the Washington Post

    Obama Gives Shout Out to 'Congressional Medal of Honor Winner' Who Isn't

    OBAMA: Please, everybody, have a seat. Let me first of all just thank Ken and the entire Department of the Interior staff for organizing just an extraordinary conference.

    I want to thank my Cabinet members and senior administration officials who participated today. I hear that Dr. Joe Medicine Crow (ph) was around, and so I want to give a shout out to that Congressional Medal of Honor winner. It's good to see you. "
    Ah, the dangers of giving shout outs without a teleprompter. Crow is not a Medal of Honor recipient. As noted by the Congressional Medal of Honor Society:


    The Medal of Honor is the highest award for valor in action against an enemy force which can be bestowed upon an individual serving in the Armed Services of the United States. Generally presented to its recipient by the President of the United States of America in the name of Congress, it is often called the Congressional Medal of Honor.

    Crow's name is not included on the Society's Medal of Honor recipient list. He was, however, awarded the Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor, in August.

    Obama, often described as "cerebral" by the mainstream media, should know the difference between the Medal of Honor and the Medal of Freedom, especially since he personally awarded the latter to Crow. Don't expect his blunder to receive wide coverage."

    And this is my favorite part..........." It's not something he can blame George Bush for."
  • commonwealth · 4 weeks ago
    The fact that Obama confused the medal of honor with the medal of freedom is trivial.

    I don't expect it to get widespread coverage in the real news. On the other hand, people hell bent on insulting and slamming Obama, the Foxphiles, expect this to be front page news.

    You are delusional.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    You dislike this President so much you can't even think straight. Its really sad to listen to you flounder.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    MJ ----- and you follow the Obummer like a sheep to slaughter.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    What is an Obummer?
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    And this wasn't......... you can watch for yourself in case you missed it..... rest assured, this country didn't.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0hiw8iXdMM

    And out of Chicago news......

    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/A-Disco...



    "President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.

    After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.

    But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?

    Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.

    Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.

    Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.

    It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.

    If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.

    All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic."

    I'm particularly impressed with how this empty suit has to constantly refer to his notes when talking about the Ft Hood tragedy, even when he calls himself Commander in Chief. Straight from the heart all right. It's right up there with the Gates/Crowley affair - this guy simply does not have a clue.
  • dennisofnashua · 1 month ago
    I heard this speech last Thursday on the rado whileI was driving home from work. I wa amazed during the first three minutes of this speech. You would have thought that our President was unaware of the tragedy at Fort Hood. Sensitivity is a trait that I would have expected from our President or any president. Thank you Ms. OReally for this post.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    You are,sir, quite welcome.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Nice spin.

    I heard the same speech on the radio, but you spin it to pretend the president was insensitive. This is not the case.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Obama has a great speechwriter and teleprompter...sincerity.....caring.....well you can all judge for yourselves.
  • dennisofnashua · 1 month ago
    I would like to know if our President has ever given a speech without a teleprompter. It seems that we have never heard anything important from his heart and off the cuff. He appears to act like a robot. I could be wrong; but I have not seen it. If we could hear him speak in his own words, and not from a teleprompter maybe we could feel more supportive of him. Just my thought.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    Are you implying a lack of honesty on Ronald Reagans part? He used a teleprompter and I have some Republican friends that will call you a 'kool aid" drinker if you are impugning his memory. I would wager that they have all used them since Kennedy at least, any others you would like to say were insincere?
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Thats all it would take?
  • dennisofnashua · 1 month ago
    Are you satisfied with President's Obama apparent insensitivity to the tragedy at Fort Hood last Thursday in his speech? If so, please enlighten me what was he thinking?
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Dennis,
    this is another red herring. He was not insensitive. Another cock and bull story from the right.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    I just read OhReally?'s post.
    You conservatives have no imagination.
    Bush sat and read a children's book while the towers fell so conservatives try to create a comparable scenario for Obama? You know your just inviting comparison to the half-wit you elected right?

    Hillary Clinton runs as a viable candidate for President so conservative pull some hayseed out of Alaska to counter. You dufus' always miss the relevance. Hillary was a qualified candidate who was a woman, being a woman was not her qualification.

    TrulyFeral even posted a Presidential gaff list for Obama, I would think you would want to forget your eight years of failure but conservatives keep bringing it up. oh well
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    those were some of Bushs, notice I left out "Well I'm the decider" the top paragraph was from another poster was intended to point out that Obama isnt the only one that could have a lot on their mind as president and may misspeak from time to time
  • mjhealey · 3 weeks ago
    I guess I didn't do a very good job reading your post myself.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    The funniest part to me is that I've posted two things relevant to that subject, and have botched both grammatically....and I'm only tired from work
  • SLRNashuan · 4 weeks ago
    mj: Obama has made gaffes and will make more. Silly me but I think it's one thing to "mis-speak" - like I do sometimes much to the delight of my grandchildren - but it's another thing to talk like an idiot or often just plain lie.

    LIE: "In terms of the economy, look, I inherited a recession, I am ending on a recession."—GWB, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2009

    DUH?: "I'm telling you there's an enemy that would like to attack America, Americans, again. There just is. That's the reality of the world. And I wish him all the very best."—GWB, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2009

    HUH?: "This thaw—took a while to thaw, it's going to take a while to unthaw."—GWB, Alexandria, La., Oct. 20, 2008

    TEE HEE: "I didn't grow up in the ocean—as a matter of fact—near the ocean—I grew up in the desert. Therefore, it was a pleasant contrast to see the ocean. And I particularly like it when I'm fishing."—GWB, Washington, D.C., Sept. 26, 2008

    TROUBLE W/NUMBERS, TOO: "Throughout our history, the words of the Declaration have inspired immigrants from around the world to set sail to our shores. These immigrants have helped transform 13 small colonies into a great and growing nation of more than 300 people."—GWB, Charlottesville, Va., July 4, 2008

    WTF??: After all, a week ago, there were—Yasser Arafat was boarded up in his building in Ramallah, a building full of, evidently, German peace protestors and all kinds of people. They're now out. He's now free to show leadership, to lead the world."—GWB, Washington, D.C., May 2, 2002

    HIC: "And so, in my State of the—my State of the Union—or state—my speech to the nation, whatever you want to call it, speech to the nation—I asked Americans to give 4,000 years—4,000 hours over the next—the rest of your life—of service to America. That's what I asked—4,000 hours." —GWB, Bridgeport, Conn., April 9, 2002

    HUH?: "There's no question this is a major human disaster that requires a strong response from the Chinese government, which is what they're providing, but it also responds a compassionate response from nations to whom—that have got the blessings, good blessings of life, and that's us."—GWB, Discussing relief efforts after a Chinese earthquake, Washington, D.C., June 6, 2008

    DUH: "And so the fact that they purchased the machine meant somebody had to make the machine. And when somebody makes a machine, it means there's jobs at the machine-making place."—GWB, visiting the Silverado Cable Co., Mesa, Ariz., May 27, 2008

    "A lot of times in politics you have people look you in the eye and tell you what's not on their mind."—GWB, Sochi, Russia, April 6, 2008

    THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF: "And so, General, I want to thank you for your service. And I appreciate the fact that you really snatched defeat out of the jaws of those who are trying to defeat us in Iraq."—GWB, meeting with Army Gen. Ray Odierno, Washington, D.C., March 3, 2008

    "Iraq is a very important part of securing the homeland, and it's a very important part of helping change the Middle East into a part of the world that will not serve as a threat to the civilized world, to people like—or to the developed world, to people like—in the United States." —GWB, Washington, D.C., April 3, 2007

    "Suiciders are willing to kill innocent life in order to send the projection that this is an impossible mission."—GWB, Washington, D.C., April 3, 2007

    The best way to defeat the totalitarian of hate is with an ideology of hope—an ideology of hate—excuse me—with an ideology of hope."—GWB, Fort Benning, Ga., Jan. 11, 2007

    "You know, when I campaigned here in 2000, I said, I want to be a war President. No President wants to be a war President, but I am one."—GWB, Des Moines, Iowa, Oct. 26, 2006

    "You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror."—GWB, Interview with CBS News, Washington D.C., Sept. 6, 2006

    TEE HEE: I'm going to try to see if I can remember as much to make it sound like I'm smart on the subject."—GWB, answering a question concerning a possible flu pandemic, Cleveland, July 10, 2007

    And, last but certainly not least, on topic in this thread:

    "If you've got somebody in harm's way, you want the president being—making advice, not—be given advice by the military, and not making decisions based upon the latest Gallup poll or focus group."—GWB, New Albany, Ind., Nov. 13, 2007
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    I didn't watch Faux news last night so I missed the narrative, do you want
    to do a quick synopsis for me?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Pathetic . . . the teleprompter meme again. Would you prefer he ignore technology and go back to the days when presidents had their speeches on flash cards? Or, maybe you'd like him to go with the old tech CRT teleprompter that Bush used to bumble his way through. Or, maybe you think presidents should spend their time memorizing their speeches.

    If you'd like to see and hear him answer questions and speaking without prepared remarks, go to C-SPAN and click on archives. You will find hours of videos. Of course, you'll think that they were all staged or some other conspiratorial explanation will come to mind.

    When you post worn out, tired, meaningless pap, you show yourself for who you are. Cranky and bitter. Get over it.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    When it's a national tragedy, you're darn right he should speak from the heart and BEFORE his shout outs. Did you somehow miss that point in all these posts?
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    If you listened to the speech instead of getting your information second hand from a shill, you would have known that he did mention the shooting before he continued with his speech and recognized those in the crowd, which is the reason he was there in the first place.

    But then again, this fact wouldn't fit into your twisted view of the world.
  • MsOreally · 4 weeks ago
    Really? Well, I'll be happy to watch it again. Where did I miss that after his introduction and "Please everybody have a seat." followed by a shout out and 2 1/2 minutes of other comments with BREAKING NEWS : ARMY: 12 DEAD and at least 31 HURT IN FT HOOD SHOOTING, scrolling across the screen?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    You are pathetic. When there's no issue, you create one. And, who appointed you as the "Presidential Should Monitor". Like you even have a clue. You are here day after day ranting about the President of the United States like he was some monster. You are just a bitter person who can't see straight through your hateful eyes. And, in typical wingnut fashion, you can't hold your own in discourse so you make childish comments.

    Since the beginning of Obama's Presidency, actually since he won his party's nomination, people have been criticizing his every word. At first, I just posted counterpoints, usually with links to original sources, thinking that presenting the facts would be important. Now, anything goes. I'm not usually the first to name-call but I have no problem responding in kind to people like you. Almost a year of blah blah blah and still counting. If you want to be taken seriously, then get serious.
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    Would note cards be dishonest? How about pieces of paper?

    Lincoln wrote out and read the Gettysburg Address. Was that dishonest?

    Washington never even spoke his Farewell Address. he wrote it out. Was that dishonest?

    Every President since FDR, and probably before that, had people write speeches for them Have we been ruled by frauds ever since?

    I guess the kids who get the best grades in class would be the kids who don't prepare at all.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    I think instead of relying on some unknown conservaive shill to tell us how the president reacted, we should listen to the president. I heard the president speak, and it wasn't like this at all.

    The president was not insensitive to these murders, that's a lie.

    The president did mention what happened, but was at a pre-scheduled speaking engagement and wanted to continue with the event.

    Whoever wrote the above, is a liar.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    That opinion piece is not " . . . out of Chicago news". I don't know how you found that obscure entertainment site but you sure are industrious in your efforts.
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    I don't recall anyone appointing you the source police. What don't you just acknowledge the content.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Beacuse the writer, like you, is a liar.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Acknowledge the content . . . the opinions of a wingnut? Are you serious? We lefties have standards. When we cite news sources, they are actual news sources. When we cite opinions, we acknowled that. If you like to consider biased opinion pieces news, well, that's consistent with your aversion to facts and truth. If you like to be in a constant state of aggitation, go for it. You are on a path that some of us chose to avoid but if it's good for you, travel on.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    SLRNashuan,
    I heard the president's speech on the radio, whoever wrote was miss orally copied here is a liar.
  • JD · 1 month ago
    At the time I posted this...
    mjhealey = 30
    commonweath = 12
    SLRNashuan = 10 posts.

    Has anyone noticed the mud slinging and name calling coming from these three and other liberal posters?
    What is with this liberal insult machine? I thought that liberal cared and were about compassion and inclusion?
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    But JD, they are on the side of compassion..... Liberals lose it when confronted with the facts and go right to the insults and personal attacks. It is their nature...

    And do not venture over to the forums section of this site as that is when the gang of bullies really take the gloves off with the foul language and namecalling....
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Seamus,
    Have you ever provided a fact in any of your posts? You really are comical.
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    How about pointing out your mis-information regarding Obama committing to adding 35,000 troops in Afghanistan? You stated it as fact and it is just speculation by the media. The military is still waiting for an answer. 3 months waiting....
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Your certain that Obama has not committed to sending more troops. your the king of hearsay seamus.
  • seamusnh · 4 weeks ago
    There has not been any public disclosure of Obama committing 35,000 more troops to the war in Afghanistan. You posted this as a fact and you were either wrong or you lied outright. Either provide a link to prove what you said or admit you were wrong....

    Obama has not made any commitment. He is asking for more options:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091112/ap_on_go_pr...

    The military leaders in Afghanistan have been waiting for an answer from Obama since August.
  • mjhealey · 4 weeks ago
    Although I am so happy you've given me such great choices to choose from I'm going to pass on both. I have never claimed that Obama commitment of 35K troups was made publicly. My quote of sources still is available by searching Google.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Mudslinging?

    UNSOLICITED insults by you righties:

    Dennis:
    "I feel sorry for them they have nothing to do all day"

    NHYanke:
    whacko worshippers,
    unemployed, nattering nabobs

    Tom P.
    cultists
    socialists
    sheeple

    nhproud:
    comrades
    epitome of arrogance

    LeftyRightie
    Unemployed collecting welfare
    Trolls
    Kool aide drinkers

    Kevindumont
    you are scary

    Woody
    you are overdue for medication

    Baxter
    irrelevant and silly

    These don't include the neverending tirade of insults heaped on President Obama.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    commonwealth - How about a little fair and balanced ....... why not do the same listings for your Left Wing Crowd.....????
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Unsolicited insults?

    or responses to your insults?

    Baxter said this:
    "Continuing to look back at bush just makes you look irrelevant and silly"

    so I responded:
    "We are ten months in, your inabilty to count makes you irrelevant and stupid."

    Nhproud said:
    "mjh/commonwealth and your fellow comrades:" "Democrats are the epitome of arrogance."

    So I said:
    "You nhproud, are the epitome of ignorance, for a lot of reasons including your slur "comrades" as you refer to me and others on this forum."

  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    In the spirit of accuracy and fair play, why didn't you add up the derisive buzzwords from both sides and post those results. If I didn't have to go to work to support those that resent having to contribute to their countrys well being, (much less the ultimate sacrifice that our service men and women make) I'd do it for you. These dishonorable and inflammatory comments from either side will be little comfort when the sheet hits the fan. So cling to your 'sides' favorite little slams because when reality hits, and we made a decision based on politcal maneuvering instead of what our country needs, you'll see then (when its too late) why that was a bad idea.
  • JD · 1 month ago
    TrulyFeral,
    Because the predominance of the comments come from a few liberal posters. They drive the comments and the tone. This is strait out of Alinsky Rules for Radicals "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon" and " Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
    The purpose is to drive away those who might voice a different opinion. They label, insult and throw mud and do not care about discourse or civility. This is the liberal way.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    I'm neutral as it regards Dems and Repubs, but you are going to have a hard time telling me that isnt EXACTLY the Republican playbook. Democrats certainly employ those tactics, but to far less a degree. Where is the indignation when Republicans do it? There are plenty of examples just on this thread. I agree with you that such tactics arent productive as it applies to the countrys needs. Will you take this opportunity to condemn Republicans that employ it?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Thumbs up, TrulyFeral.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    There is 133 comments on this page, your evil three only account for a third of the comments on this page. No where near a predominance.
    So what is a honest person suppose to do when someone like you posts a lie like this?
    Should I accept that your "opinion" is that 30% is a majority?
    And then you go ranting about Sal Alinsky Rules for radicals.
    Currently liberals are the party in power, and you would be the radical in this scenario.

    Yes I post a lot on this website.
    I do not insult without provocation.
    I will call you out if you choose to be dishonest.
    It would be great if we could debate Americas problems on there merits, but most of the time I'm fighting just to get you on the same planet.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Exactly true.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    What comm said, mj.
  • BigDaddyNH · 1 month ago
    keeping with full disclosure, I, on the other hand, will insult without provocation.
    Sometimes it's easy, like shooting fish in a barrel.
    But what I don't do is throw up names like Saul Alinsky (I dare ANY rightie to say that they heard of him 12 months ago)
    While your at it, which one of you had ever heard of Bill Ayers, ACORN, or any other name on FOX's "enemies list" prior to FOX telling you that they are evil?
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    I like it when you toss out the zingers. Very entertaining. Never mean, but knee-slapping, Pepsi spritzing funny. In fact, I'm hankerin' for some gold old BigDaddy wisdom right now.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    JD
    Baloney. This Alinsky stuff is garbage. I've never heard of the the guy until the right wing came up with their conspiracy theory.

    My ridicule and insult was deliberately responsive to other's insults. You don't pay close enough attention.

    No one is driving away anyone.




  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Alinsky, Soros, blah blah blah comes straight from the Drudgies and trickles down, just like you know what trickles or rolls down, to the other blogs and on to TV/radio. The wingnuts follow the tactics - with scripts of "words that work" and "words that don't work" - outlined by Luntz and Castellanos and numerous others, including the memos from the RNC. (Google those two and read their memos and you'll find, almost verbatim, the rantings of the tea baggers and Congresspeople.)
    They think that by invoking those names and themes that they are somehow making some damning statement about "libruls". I don't take offense at all. I just think they're goofy.
  • nhproud · 1 month ago
    Commonwealth, wow. If anyone has a reason to respond to insults, for the past 8 years the left wing has attempted to discredit, insult, humilate, and defame a very honorable man-GWB. At the very least, you have shown no respect for the office of the presidency, let alone treat a fellow human with dignity,and a fellow American to boot. So dont you dare pull the i am only responding to insults card, because you and your fellow Democrats are an absolute, total, unapologic, dishonorable excuse for compassionate Americans. Your tactics displayed the last 8 years are the same displayed on NT, you drive the negative tone, make everything partisan and forsake civility for political and socialist gain. You and the Democratic Party should be ashamed, and i condemn your actions here and your party in Wash DC.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    nhproud,
    GWB had the highest approval rating of any President EVER. You rewriting of history does not ring true.

    All of America rallied round the President after he failed us on 9/11. We were all willing to support the narrative that he was as big a victim as us on 9/11. Bush had all of America and a majority of the world on his side as he sat and decided how to respond to the worst terrorist attack in American history. Bush decision was to deceive the American people and the world that he had evidence of WMD in Iraq, Bush decided to ignore the Constitution, Bush decided to secretly torture people of his choosing. America did not let Bush down, it was the other way around.

    So don't you dare pull the I am only responding to insults card, because you and your fellow Conservatives are an absolute, total, unapologetic, dishonorable excuse for compassionate Americans. Your tactics displayed the last year are the same displayed on NT, you drive the negative tone, make everything partisan and forsake civility for political gain. You and the Republican Party should be ashamed, and I condemn your actions here and your party's in Wash DC.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Giving you a standing ovation, mj!
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    nhproud: Hope you are wearing hip boots 'cause you're really slinging it - right out of the Luntz playbook. One minute, Bush should not be invoked because he's no longer president so lefties, get over it. Next minute, Bush is invoked as a reason to trash lefties. Lame.

    Do you remember the last 8 years at all? Bush had enormous support for a time. When he started lying us in to war, when those elusive WMDs couldn't be found, when he eroded our sacred freedoms with his illegal spying, when we figured out that he was driving the economy in the ditch, people first started questioning and, when some of the questions were anwered, people started to speak out. No leftie ever defamed Bush. He, with the help or Cheney, did it to himself.
  • nhproud · 1 month ago
    mjh, commonwealth, slrn...LOL...You made my day because I know my words rilied your liberal spirits as each of you responded with in minutes of my posting. You should read what you write, the comments are just amazingly gross exagerations, or outright lies. Nothing but absurd allegatons, and the fact you three dislike me, well that just makes me happier, as other ppl who read this exchange can see the antics liberal democrats engage in, and will soon join the sildent majority to oust the Democrats next election...Now all you guys, maybe you can trash our country, our troops, our economy and feel good about it, but most of us regular ppl are sick of this left turn lead by Dems, and will continue to voice our opposition, so try & insult me, but we wont stop...
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Three people fed you your lunch today and your response is that you didn't really mean what you said and you were just trying to rile us up? This kind of defensive talk works for my 11 year old but not so much from adults.

    I will accept that you don't know what your talking about and are not qualified to debate on the level with most adults. I would also accept your pledge that you, in particular, stop pretending your capable of forming adult opinions and stop posting. Good luck with your further endeavors.
  • nhproud · 1 month ago
    mjhealy--WTF how did you get out of my post that i didnt mean a word of what I wrote, and you fed me lunch...LOL. Illusions of grandeaur. At least your fellow commrade attacked with some relevance to my statement (Commonwealth), your reply is about as logical as saying Obama is a moderate. So i suggest you stop pretending to be a grown up, as you are incapable of forming independent thought unless spoon fed by MSNBC, and i implore you to stop posting. Good luck with your future endeavors. Perhaps you can put another "End this War" on your Prius to make you feel like you contributed something to your country.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    More name calling?
    You really are frazzled.
    commrade, MSMBC, Bumper Stickers, Prius? Touching all the hot buttons? You really are embarrassing yourself now.
  • MsOreally · 4 weeks ago
    Can we hear another Amen.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    "...maybe you can trash our troops our country..."

    nhproud,
    This is what you believe: "The Democrats are all liberals, and they all hate out country and our troops."

    Yes, let's let the reading public see this.




  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    Wonderful. It is Veteran's Day and Commonwealth terms his calling General Patreas "General Bootlicker" as "criticism". That is how liberals respectively disagree with US military leaders. Commonwealth justifies it and calls anyone that points out his slander a naze....
  • seamusnh · 1 month ago
    The Left called General Patreas "General Betray Us". Commonwealth went one better and called him "general bootlicker" in the forums section of this site. Indicative of his opinion of the military....
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Seamus thinks that if you criticize one general in the military, then you hate the military.

    Nice try seamus, no cigar.

    Typical right wing Fox smear tactics, God forbid anyone should criticize a general, then you are branded as "anti-military, anti-government."

    Nice work Seamus, it's worthy of Rove and Stalin and Goebbels.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    The anti-war group Moveon.org attacked General David Petraeus in a September 10 full-page advertisement in the New York Times, accusing him of being "constantly at war with the facts." They asked in Faux News fashion. General Betray Us? It was not "liberals" but Anti War Activists. Get your propaganda straight.
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2...
  • tomgnh · 1 month ago
    It was not anti-war activists- it was, among others, a fellow general-
    Americans doubt ‘General Betraeus’ over troop surge (8/19/07):

    AFTER being hailed as King David, the potential saviour of Iraq, the US commander General David Petraeus is facing a backlash in advance of his report to Congress in September on the progress of America’s troop surge.

    Critics, including one recently retired general, are privately calling him "General Betraeus" on the grounds that he is too ambitious to deliver a balanced report on the war.

    Lawrence Korb, a defence official under Ronald Reagan who is now at the Center for American Progress, a Democratic think tank, said Petraeus was regarded as "the most political general since General (Douglas) Mac-Arthur", a reference to the second world war hero who was touted as a possible president.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    I wouldn't call Bush honorable. Ask John McCain who spread rumors during the 2000 primaries about his "special treatment" at Hanoi Hilton.
    And you are going off on a tangent.
    The issue is here, posters insulting posters. Now you want to talk about people insulting Bush.
    "You and your fellow Democrats are blahbidiblah blah blah blah."
    Get off your high horse, stop being so holier than thou.
    And stop with the silly soclialist insults, your post only serves to perpetuate the back and forth mudslinging.
    "I condemn your actions...you should be ashamed... blah blah yadayada."
    Who are you? The freakin' Pope?
    As if you and conservative Republicans have a monopoly on virtue? Stop, you are making a giant fool of yerself. You narcissistic nincompoop.







  • MsOreally · 4 weeks ago
    Amen, nhproud, amen.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    JD,
    At the time this was posted this is your only post on this page.
    Your only concern is how many posts I have?
    During discussions people exchange thoughts and viewpoints, its how a civil society works. I wonder why none of this stuff entices you to comment, do you not think your opinion is good enough?
  • kevindumont · 1 month ago
    commonwealth you bring absoutely nothing too the table but insults .where is your compassion you liberals spout about all the time. i guess its for people that agree with you.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    If you paid closer attention, you'd see that I respond to people who say I'm irrelevant and silly with the same.

    You don't really pay attention to what I write, you only pay attention when I insult someone, when I respond in kind.

    This is typicalof the right wing.

    Fox bashes Obama 24/7, so the White House responds, calling them a poltical outfit, and it is Obama's attack on Fox, not Obama defending himself against attackers.

    Nice try, but you righties have a victim complex.

    I responded to you that when Reagan ended his last term, Republicans were nostalgic for the days before presidential term limts.

    There was no insult, just fact. And yet you criticze the opposition, falsely I might add, of wanting to do away with presidental term limits.

    Seems you have no answers to your hypocrisy, so you focus on any insult I might have hurled in my defense.







  • NHYankee · 1 month ago
    Pure baloney
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Monkey see, monkey do.
  • tomp · 1 month ago
    I believe that the Obama cultists are only following the examples of other socialists in regards to shutting down news organizations that do not polish the halo of their "Dear Leader".

    The Soviets only had Pravda and their own on-air "news" organizations. No one was allowed to buck the 'party line'. If anyone did, then not only were they shut down, but the reporters were never heard from again.

    They are only following in the footsteps of Kim Il in North Korea.
    Absolutely no there one is allowed to say anything against that despot.
    They are following in the footsteps of Fidel Castro in Cuba. No one in Cuba is allowed to say anything against the ole cigar chomper. They are following in the footsteps of the Red Chinese. Ask anyone in Tibet.


    More currently, they are longing for following the example of Chavez and his gang of thugs.:
    "Chavez Closes 34 Radio Stations" (
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/02/world... )
    "Chavez cancels opposition TV station's license" (http://www.unknownnews.org/070106-Chavez-RCTV.html )

    Meantime the Obama sheeples are giggling over calling Fox News... "Faux News".
    Hope and Change? Obamaists are "hoping" that they can "change" the Fourth Estate into one of the shining examples I gave above.

    ---Tom P












  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    Tom,
    Honestly? Are you this delusional? Our President has called out an admitted right wing cable station for their blatant bias, and your trying to compare this to communist Russia, or China? Are daft or just a child?
  • nhproud · 1 month ago
    mjh/commonwealth and your fellow comrades: I am not going to initially questions your motives for making absord, baseless comments about Fox News. I sincerely ask how you can defend the Obama administration as it aggressively seeks to silence the only news outlet that reports fair and balanced information. Daily there are acts of media manipulation peformed by Obama's administration. Even today, there was a call to Democrat consultant to was interviewed on Fox threatening reprecussion if he spoke again on Fox. How is that not grossly unfair to FOX. I am so sick of liberals repeating MoveOn.org lines, when Obama is stifling anoyone who disagrees. Democrats are the epitome of arogance, and in fact, everything that they accuse Fox of being.
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    You are a dumbell nhproud.

    Obama is not trying to silence Fox. There is something called the constitution, and recently, US court precedent has decided that Fox can lie under the constitution's free speech clause.

    You are a dumbell for two reasons:

    1. Your belief that President Obama is trying to silence Fox.
    2. Your belief that Fox is "fair and balanced."

    These beliefs are not reality based.
    You nhproud, are the epitome of ignorance, for a lot of reasons including your slur "comrades" as you refer to me and others on this forum.






  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    comm: Behold the stupid of our land. When anyone tries to speak truth or make sense, they put their hands over their ears and chant "la la la la la I won't hear you". They persist because they have made an investment in their hate and lies and are waiting for their return. Would love to look in to their dark souls and know their motivation.
  • LeftyRighty · 1 month ago
    Commonwealth......calling names is childish. Say what you have to say and cut the defamation.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    L_R,
    Your going to stop calling people names? Its kinda your whole shtick. Are you sure you could do it?
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    Calling names is childish you say?

    Did you castigate nhproud for calling people names; "comrades?"

    Of course you didn't you have a double standard. Only people who share you opinions can insult those who disagree.

    Here's a name for you that's not childish; hypocrite.
  • mjhealey · 1 month ago
    nhp,
    What have I said that you disagree with?
    Do you not know that Faux is a conservative channel?
    Do you not now that they repeat GOP talking points in their new as if it is news, typos and all?
    You do realize that Obama has only refused to work with them for two months?
    Faux is not ashamed of their allegiance with the GOP, you should not be either.
    Obama is simply calling Faux for what it is.
    Try to learn a little without Faux feeding you the answers, your efforts might surprise you.
  • G · 1 month ago
    You think?
  • commonwealth · 1 month ago
    No, it's obvious from his letter, Dennis doesn't think.
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    Thanks, Tesha, for your efforts.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    "Obama, often described as "cerebral" by the mainstream media, should know the difference between the Medal of Honor and the Medal of Freedom, especially since he personally awarded the latter to Crow. Don't expect his blunder to receive wide coverage."

    And this is my favorite part..........." It's not something he can blame George Bush for."

    I agree, Presidents arent that busy and you would think he could something as simple as that straight


    Yes, believe it or not, these are all genuine quotes from the man the people elected as the 43rd US President:

    Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.

    I admit it, I am not one of the great linguists.

    For every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And, folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just unacceptable. And we're going to do something about it.

    I am a person who recognizes the fallacy of humans.

    I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them.

    I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.

    I know how hard it is to put food on your family.

    I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe - I believe what I believe is right.

    I promise you I will listen to what has been said here, even though I wasn't here.

    I recently met with the finance minister of the Palestinian Authority, was very impressed by his grasp of finances.

    I think anybody who doesn't think I'm smart enough to handle the job is underestimating.

    I think war is a dangerous place.

    I understand small business growth. I was one.

    I wish I wasn't the war president. Who in the heck wants to be a war president? I don't.

    I'm not a very good novelist. But it'd make a pretty interesting novel.

    If the terriers and bariffs are torn down, this economy will grow.

    If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier - so long as I'm the dictator.

    I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things.

    I'm the master of low expectations.

    I'm the commander - see, I don't need to explain - I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being President.

    It would be a mistake for the United States Senate to allow any kind of human cloning to come out of that chamber.

    Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?

    Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people and neither do we.

    The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for entrepreneur.

    There's an old saying in Tennessee, I know it's in Texas, probably Tennessee, that says 'Fool me once [pause], shame on…shame on you. [Long pause] Fool me. [Pause] You can't get fooled again.'

    They have miscalculated me as a leader.

    They misunderestimated me.

    This foreign policy stuff is a little frustrating.

    We cannot let terrorists and rogue nations hold this nation hostile or hold our allies hostile.

    We need an energy bill that encourages consumption.

    We ought to make the pie higher.

    We're concerned about AIDS inside our White House - make no mistake about it.

    Will the highways on the Internet become more few?

    Do you have blacks, too? (To Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso)

    When I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible.

    You're free. And freedom is beautiful. And, you know, it'll take time to restore chaos and order - order out of chaos. But we will.

    This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mential losses.

    I think there is a Trojan horse lurking in the weeds trying to pull a fast one on the American people.

    This is a world that is much more uncertain than the past. In the past we were certain, we were certain it was us versus the Russians in the past. We were certain, and therefore we had huge nuclear arsenals aimed at each other to keep the peace. That's what we were certain of…You see, even though it's an uncertain world, we're certain of some things.

    It is clear our nation is reliant upon big foreign oil. More and more of our imports come from overseas.

    I think we agree, the past is over.

    And there's no doubt in my mind, not one doubt in my mind, that we will fail.

    The important question is, how many hands have I shaked.

    General…I can't name the general.(When asked to name President of Pakistan)

    We spent a lot of time talking about Africa, as we should. Africa is a nation that suffers from incredible disease.

    The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein because of the nature of Saddam Hussein, the history of Saddam Hussein, and his willingness to terrorize himself.

    When I was a kid I remember that they used to put out there in the Old West a wanted poster. It said, Wanted: Dead or Alive.

    My answer is to bring them on. (On Iraqi militants attacking US forces)

    Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. -- May 1, 2003


    Ohhhhhhh wait, I got my Presidents mixed up,....nevermind
  • MsOreally · 1 month ago
    Well I hope you feel better now, TR. Would you like me to come back with some more of BO's gaffes or do you want to stick to this one? By dredging up your list it just illustrates how absolutely mean and hateful the left has been, keeping nice lonnng lists to resurrect at a moment's notice to deflect any attention to the here and NOW and the present POTUS that wants a PASS on everything. Well, I say practice what you preach, and that goes for BO. He campaigned on bipartisanship yet has extreme difficulty uttering a sentence without Bush, blah,blah ,blah.He purposely ramps up the partisan rhetoric. He is not a candidate anymore and he's supposed to be President of ALL the people including over 58 million who did not vote for him.
  • TrulyFeral · 1 month ago
    So now we know your intent was to be mean and hateful. My point in posting that was to point out that these are very busy people, it doesnt matter if they are Democrat or Republican, they are going to get tongue tied and twisted. These men have issues weighing on their minds that are immense in the effect they will have on people. Some, like many you will honor today, in the ultimate way. You speak of "ramping up the partisan rhetoric" within 24 hours of your own attempt to disparage the current president with ...you guessed it...partisan rhetoric. Perhaps next time, simply consider what these people have on their mind on a daily basis before you bash them. By all means keep saving them, because as you can see, some of them can be quite funny, Obamas will be no exception I'm sure.
  • seamusnh · 4 weeks ago
    Here are a few Obama-sims:

    "It was also interesting to see that political interaction in Europe is not that different from the United States Senate. There's a lot of -- I don't know what the term is in Austrian, wheeling and dealing." --confusing German for "Austrian," a language which does not exist, Strasbourg, France, April 6, 2009

    “There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, Alabama, because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.” (Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march was in 1965)

    “Thank you Sioux City” Obama said in Sioux Falls.

    “My father served in World War II, and when he came home, he got the services that he needed.” (At the end of WWII, Obama’s father was 10 years old.)

    "The reforms we seek would bring greater competition, choice, savings and inefficiencies to our health care system." --in remarks after a health care roundtable with physicians, nurses and health care providers, Washington, D.C., July 20, 2009

    "No, no. I have been practicing...I bowled a 129. It's like -- it was like Special Olympics, or something." --making an off-hand joke during an appearance on "The Tonight Show", March 19, 2009 (Obama later called the head of the Special Olympics to apologize)

    "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances." --after saying he had spoken with all the living presidents as he prepared to take office, Washington, D.C., Nov. 7, 2008 (Obama later called Nancy Reagan to apologize)

    "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody." -- defending his tax plan to Joe the Plumber, who argued that Obama's policy hurts small-business owners like himself, Toledo, Ohio, Oct. 12, 2008

    "What I was suggesting -- you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith..." --in an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who jumped in to correct Obama by saying "your Christian faith," which Obama quickly clarified (Watch video clip)

    "I'm here with the Girardo family here in St. Louis." --speaking via satellite to the Democratic National Convention, while in Kansas City, Missouri, Aug. 25, 2008

    "Let me introduce to you the next President -- the next Vice President of the United States of America, Joe Biden." --slipping up while introducing Joe Biden at their first joint campaign rally, Springfield, Illinois, Aug. 23, 2008

    "Just this past week, we passed out of the out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee -- which is my committee -- a bill to call for divestment from Iran as way of ratcheting up the pressure to ensure that they don't obtain a nuclear weapon." --referring to a committee he is not on, Sderot, Israel, July 23, 2008

    "Let me be absolutely clear. Israel is a strong friend of Israel's. It will be a strong friend of Israel's under a McCain...administration. It will be a strong friend of Israel's under an Obama administration. So that policy is not going to change." --Amman, Jordan, July 22, 2008

    "How's it going, Sunshine?" --campaigning in Sunrise, Florida

    "On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today -- our sense of patriotism is particularly strong."

    "Hold on one second, sweetie, we're going to do -- we'll do a press avail." --to a female reporter for ABC's Detroit affiliate who asked about his plan to help American autoworkers

    "I've now been in 57 states -- I think one left to go." --at a campaign event in Beaverton, Oregon

    "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." --explaining his troubles winning over some working-class voters

    "The point I was making was not that Grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn't. But she is a typical white person, who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know, you know, there's a reaction that's been bred in our experiences that don't go away and that sometimes come out in the wrong way, and that's just the nature of race in our society."

    "Come on! I just answered, like, eight questions." --exasperated by reporters after a news conference

    "In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died -- an entire town destroyed." --on a Kansas tornado that killed 12 people
  • MsOreally · 4 weeks ago
    Thanks seamusnh......... saved me the trouble.
  • TrulyFeral · 4 weeks ago
    See what I mean? My favorite is the 57 state one
  • SLRNashuan · 1 month ago
    TrulyFeral: Here's my favorite Bushism website. It is still being updated. It is Slates "Complete Bushisms", with links to videos and audio, dates, and places. http://slate.com/id/76886/ Good old George is the gift that keeps on giving. ; )
  • walstib · 1 month ago
    Haha - that's awesome.

    "In terms of the economy, look, I inherited a recession, I am ending on a recession."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2009

    Bush first took office in January 2001 - there was no recession at that time. The early 2000s recession began after 9/11/2001 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions...).
  • TrulyFeral · 4 weeks ago
    I love a good laugh, will check it out, ty